U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must now disclose the value of travel-related gifts they receive by classifying such free trips as "reimbursements" on their financial disclosure forms.
No Supreme Court term in recent memory has featured so many cases with the potential to transform American society.
Supreme Court justices are divided along political lines over whether or not to explain their recusals, and legal experts are very concerned. Liberal justices are giving full disclosure about ...
A majority of Kentucky justices did not file financial disclosures last year and did not file their reports on time in 2024, ...
The US Supreme ... bound by rules, the Supreme Court has remained aloof. That was clear last year when justices signed a ...
The Supreme Court on Monday for a second time shot down a request from former Trump adviser Peter Navarro to avoid further ...
As if the Supreme ... the court released last year. It was meant to calm critics of the justices who pointed out, rightly, that while the lower federal courts have formal ethics rules, the ...
The retired liberal justice spoke to ABC News Live Prime. Associate Supreme ... rule of law only survives with public confidence in the institution. Why should the public trust that members of the ...
Herschel Fink, general counsel for the Detroit Free Press, said the rule appears to violate case law from the U.S. Supreme Court ... back to the district court. Justice David Viviano, in a partial ...