U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges must now disclose the value of travel-related gifts they receive by classifying such free trips as "reimbursements" on their financial disclosure forms.
While New York’s criminal case against former President Donald Trump with regard to the 2016 election is progressing, the ...
Supreme Court justices are limited in how much outside income they can earn while on the bench. Ethics rules prevent them from earning more ... Although the Covid-19 pandemic limited the justices’ ...
Melanie Stansbury, D-N.M. and backed by 10 other House Democrats — takes direct aim at recent scrutiny of Supreme Court ...
Supreme Court justices are divided along political lines over whether or not to explain their recusals, and legal experts are very concerned. Liberal justices are giving full disclosure about ...
The case, which could reverberate beyond Idaho to other states with abortion bans, is the second time in less than a month ...
The Supreme Court will consider a straightforward but legally untested question: whether a former president is immune from ...
The justices will hear Trump v. United States next week without the 45th president in attendance. The Stormy Daniels judge — ...
Herschel Fink, general counsel for the Detroit Free Press, said the rule appears to violate case law from the U.S. Supreme Court ... back to the district court. Justice David Viviano, in a partial ...
March 18 (Reuters) - U.S. Supreme Court justices and federal judges can no longer avoid disclosing the value of travel-related gifts they receive by classifying such free trips as "reimbursements ...
Authorities in Singapore said they charged two former officials of Sembcorp Marine on Thursday with handing bribes to Brazilian officials to advance the company's interests in the South American ...