The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday wades back into the battle over abortion access in arguments pitting Idaho's strict Republican-backed abortion ban against a federal law that ensures that patients can receive emergency care.
The Supreme Court is considering a case that will determine when doctors can provide abortions during medical emergencies in states with bans enacted after the high court’s sweeping decision overturning Roe v.
The U.S. Supreme Court will soon decide whether a federal law requiring hospitals to provide emergency treatment overrides states' abortion restrictions.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Wednesday in a case that could determine whether doctors can provide abortions to pregnant women with medical emergencies in states that enact abortion bans
Supreme court’s liberal minority shows doubt about Idaho’s argument but would need two conservative justices to vote against it in order to be effective
U.S. Supreme Court justices, wading back into the battle over abortion access, appeared divided on Wednesday in a case pitting Idaho's strict Republican-backed abortion ban against a federal law that ensures that patients can receive emergency care.
The court on Wednesday is set to hear arguments in a case pitting Idaho's strict abortion ban against a federal law that ensures that patients can receive emergency care. It force
Justices considered whether federal law permits emergency-room doctors to perform abortions to preserve a woman’s health even in states that outlaw the procedure.
The Supreme Court appeared divided Wednesday on the Biden administration’s effort to ensure access to abortion in emergency rooms despite Idaho’s near-total criminal ban on the procedure. During the nearly two hours of oral argument,
The contentious issue of abortion has returned to the Supreme Court, with the justices prepared on Wednesday to weigh a states rights challenge over hospital emergency room access to the procedure.
The Supreme Court heard arguments in a case that pits Idaho's near-total abortion ban against a federal law that requires hospitals to offer emergency care.
The US Supreme Court will consider just how far states can go in prohibiting abortion Wednesday as it weighs whether emergency room doctors nationwide can perform the procedure when a pregnant woman’s health is at serious risk.
The U.S. Supreme Court is taking up a major abortion case today that could determine when hospitals can perform the procedure during medical emergencies. The case involves Idaho’s abortion ban but will have implications for Texas,
The case out of Idaho marks yet another challenge – the second before the justices in a month – seeking to clarify post-Roe abortion laws. And the stakes, legally and politically, are high yet again.
could establish a significant precedent regarding whether emergency medical care can be denied to a pregnant woman in distress in order to save the fetus.
The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a case about whether Idaho's near-total ban on abortion is preempted by Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA.
The US Supreme Court is hearing arguments over whether a near-total abortion ban in Idaho goes against a federal law requiring hospitals to provide care to patients with "emergency medical conditions".
NBC News Washington Correspondent Yamiche Alcindor joins Meet the Press NOW to report on the Supreme Court hearing oral arguments on an Idaho abortion ban that conflicts with federal law on emergency medical care.
The Supreme Court heard arguments today on Idaho's strict abortion ban. NBC News' Yamiche Alcindor, Slate senior editor Dahlia Lithwick and University of California, Davis law professor Mary Ziegler weigh in on the arguments being made by Idaho and the federal government.
In a Supreme Court hearing on the Biden administration’s challenge to aspects of Idaho’s strict abortion ban, US Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar sought to appeal to conservative justices who just two years ago ruled that states should have the ability to prohibit the procedure.
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments on Idaho’s strict abortion law, which the Biden administration says conflicts with a federal law regarding emergency medical treatment. NBC News’ Yamiche Alcindor,
WASHINGTON—The abortion wars returned to the Supreme Court Wednesday, as justices considered whether federal law permits emergency-room doctors to perform abortions to preserve a woman’s health even in states that outlaw the procedure.
Supreme Court justices are hearing arguments today on emergency abortion care. The Biden administration says Idaho's near-total abortion ban conflicts with a federal law. NBC News' Yamiche Alcindor is outside the Supreme Court with reporting and MSNBC's Lisa Rubin provides more legal analysis.
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in another major abortion access case as it grapples with the aftermath of reversing Roe v. Wade. Follow here for live audio of the arguments, news updates, analysis and more.
Supreme Court is considering a case that will determine when doctors can provide abortions during medical emergencies in states with bans enacted after the high court’s sweeping decision overturning Roe v.
Image caption, The Supreme Court will weigh in on abortion access once again, nearly two years after overturning Roe v Wade The Supreme Court will consider yet another high-stakes abortion case, one with potentially sweeping consequences for emergency rooms across the country.
Nearly two years after overturning the constitutional right to abortion, the Supreme Court will consider Wednesday how far state bans can extend to women in medical emergencies.
Nearly two years after overturning the constitutional right to abortion, the Supreme Court will consider how far state abortion bans can extend to women in medical emergencies
The Supreme Court considers whether Idaho's near-total abortion ban conflicts with a federal law aimed at ensuring certain standards for emergency medical care for patients, including pregnant women.
Republican- and Democratic-appointed members of the Supreme Court on Wednesday appeared sharply divided regarding whether Idaho’s near-total prohibition of abortions conflicts with federal emergency medicine statutes.
US Supreme Court justices clashed over the limits on state power to ban abortion when a woman’s health is in jeopardy, suggesting a deep divide over a Biden administration bid to protect access in medical emergencies.
The Supreme Court hears arguments Wednesday in a case centered on whether emergency room doctors can provide abortions to women... Federal laws supersede state ones. The law here — The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) — is very clear: hospitals must stabilize patients who come into their emergency rooms in distress.
Two years after ending the national right to abortion by overturning Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court will scrutinize one of the marquee efforts by the Biden administration to preserve abortion access in the post-Roe v.
The Biden administration argues hospitals must provide abortions under EMTALA in the case of emergencies, even if it conflicts with a state’s abortion ban.
The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Wednesday in a dispute between the state of Idaho and the Biden administration over whether state bans on abortion violate federal emergency medicine statutes,